On 7/3/2023 14:06, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Mario,
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 12:43:06PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
On 7/3/23 08:57, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Mario,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 08:16:25PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 05:56:01PM +0000, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
[Public]
Hi,
A regression was reported in 6.4-rc6 that monitor resolutions are no longer present for anything but native resolution on eDP panels. This specific change backported into stable at 6.1.35 and 6.3.9:
e749dd10e5f29 ("drm/amd/display: edp do not add non-edid timings")
After discussing it with the original author, they submitted a revert commit for review:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/544273/
I suggested the revert also CC stable, and I expect this will go up in 6.5-rc1, but given the timing of the merge window and the original issue hit the stable trees, can we revert it sooner in the stable
trees to avoid exposing the regression to more people?
As the submitted patch had the wrong git id, it might be good to be able
to take a real one? I can take it once it shows up in linux-next if
it's really going to be going into 6.5, but I need a stable git id for
it.
Do you know, did that felt trough the cracks or is it still planned to
do the revert?
Regards,
Salvatore
Hi,
It's part of the PR that was sent for 6.5-rc1 [1]. Unfortunately it's not
yet merged AFAICT to drm-next yet nor Linus' tree.
d6149086b45e [2] is the specific commit ID.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/545125/
[2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/agd5f/linux/-/commit/d6149086b45e150c170beaa4546495fd1880724c
Ack, thanks!
Regards,
Salvatore
The revert is in Linus' tree as of this morning. Greg, can you take
this back now?
d6149086b45e1 ("Revert "drm/amd/display: edp do not add non-edid timings"")
