On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 08:24:34AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: > On 6/15/23 23:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > > > Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> (2023-06-15): > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:21:07PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote: > > > > At the time this was proposed it was said that "of-display", is wrong, > > > > and that "of-display.0" must be used for the first device instead, and > > > > if something breaks an alias can be provided. > > > > > > > > So how does one provide an alias so that offb can find "of-display.0" > > > > as "of-display"? > > > > > > I'm not aware of any way. There isn't because device names and paths are > > > not considered ABI. There are mechanisms for getting stable class device > > > indices (e.g. i2c0, mmcblk0, fb0, fb1, etc.) though not implemented for > > > fbN (and please don't add it). > > > > > > In any case, this should be an easy fix. Though if "linux,opened" or > > > "linux,boot-display" is not set, then you'd still get "of-display.0": > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c > > > index 78ae84187449..e46482cef9c7 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c > > > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c > > > @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void) > > > if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) || > > > !of_get_property(node, "linux,boot-display", NULL)) > > > continue; > > > - dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display.0", NULL); > > > + dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display", NULL); > > > of_node_put(node); > > > if (WARN_ON(!dev)) > > > return -ENOMEM; > > Michal, does that patch look correct? > I don't have that hardware, but that way the boot-display gets named > "of-display" while all others get "of-display.x".... Yes, that's inconsistent, and IIRC it's what I originally proposed to preserve compatibility as much as possible. The patch went through multiple iteration by me and Rob and the final version that was merged uses the consistent but incompatible naming. The other option would be to adapt the offb driver, presumably. I don't understand how the device name figures in attaching the driver to the device, the only other occurence of of-display is the name of the offb and ofdrm drivers. > > I've just replaced my clueless workaround with this patch on top of the > > kernel found in Debian 12 (Bookworm), i.e. 6.1.27 at this point, and it > > indeed fixes the black screen problem in the installer's context. > > ... at least it fixes the issue. I would expect as much. I don't have the hardware either but keeping what was there before, and only adding on top is kind of the least disruptive way of adding new stuff. Thanks Michal
