Re: Possible build time regression affecting stable kernels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 2:15 PM Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2023-06-01 14:10, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 1:05 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> On 2023-06-01 11:45, Paul Moore wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >>>> I don't want to block on fixing the kernel build while I keep chasing
> >>>> some esoteric build behavior so I'm just going to revert the patch
> >>>> with a note to revisit this when we require make >= 4.3.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regardless, thanks for the report and the help testing, expect a
> >>>> patch/revert shortly ...
> >>>
> >>> Thank you Paul, I really appreciate your fast response. I'd also
> >>> appreciate if you CC me in the revert patch so that I don't loose
> >>> track of it.
> >>
> >> And please add a cc: stable@ to it too :)
> >
> > Done, and done.  I just sent the patch so give it a few minutes if you
> > haven't seen it yet.  I'll leave it for a few hours in case anyone can
> > give it a test build before I send it up to Linus.
>
> Thanks Paul, I can test it but it may take more than a few hours for me.

Okay, no worries, I'll hold off until I hear back from you.  I'd
rather it take a little longer in order to get the warm fuzzies you
get from a 'Tested-by:' by one of the 'Reported-by:' people :)

Thanks for all your help with this Luiz.

-- 
paul-moore.com




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux