On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 03:01:21PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 02:20:22PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 30006b77c7e130e01d1ab2148cc8abf73dfcc4bf ]
> >
> > The driver only supports normal polarity. Complete the implementation of
> > .get_state() by setting .polarity accordingly.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 1f0d3bb02785 ("pwm: Add ChromeOS EC PWM driver")
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228135508.1798428-3-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I see you picked this one and the similar sprd patch, but not
>
> 8caa81eb950c pwm: meson: Explicitly set .polarity in .get_state()
> b20b097128d9 pwm: iqs620a: Explicitly set .polarity in .get_state()
> 6f5793798014 pwm: hibvt: Explicitly set .polarity in .get_state()
>
> (At least I didn't get a mail about these). These should qualify in the same way.
They didn't all apply very well (one did).
> Maybe you also want to pick
>
> 1271a7b98e79 pwm: Zero-initialize the pwm_state passed to driver's .get_state()
I've queued that up to 6.2 only, the other trees it didn't apply to,
want to send a backport?
thanks,
greg k-h
