On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:26 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:21:39AM +0000, maennich@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Currently, scripts/pahole-flags.sh has no formal maintainer. Add it to > > the BPF section so that patches to it can be properly reviewed and > > picked up. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220201205624.652313-2-nathan@xxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 4f50a453e18a..176485e625a0 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -3407,6 +3407,7 @@ F: net/sched/act_bpf.c > > F: net/sched/cls_bpf.c > > F: samples/bpf/ > > F: scripts/bpf_doc.py > > +F: scripts/pahole-flags.sh > > F: tools/bpf/ > > F: tools/lib/bpf/ > > F: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ > > -- > > 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog > > > > No need for MAINTAINERS updates for older kernels as no one should be > making new patches against them, right? This one is optional, but it makes the next one apply cleanly and I picked the entire series. Cheers, Matthias > > thanks, > > greg k-h
