On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:21:39AM +0000, maennich@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Currently, scripts/pahole-flags.sh has no formal maintainer. Add it to > the BPF section so that patches to it can be properly reviewed and > picked up. > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220201205624.652313-2-nathan@xxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 4f50a453e18a..176485e625a0 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -3407,6 +3407,7 @@ F: net/sched/act_bpf.c > F: net/sched/cls_bpf.c > F: samples/bpf/ > F: scripts/bpf_doc.py > +F: scripts/pahole-flags.sh > F: tools/bpf/ > F: tools/lib/bpf/ > F: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ > -- > 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog > No need for MAINTAINERS updates for older kernels as no one should be making new patches against them, right? thanks, greg k-h
