Re: Patches for 5.15-stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/22/23 8:06 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/22/23 7:46 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 10:52:10AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Two parts here:
>>>
>>> 1) The wakeup fix that went into 5.10-stable, but hadn't been done for
>>>    5.15-stable yet. It was the last 3 patches in the 5.10-stable backport
>>>    for io_uring
>>>
>>> 2) Other patches that were marked for stable or should go to stable, but
>>>    initially failed.
>>>
>>> This gets us to basically parity on the regression test front for 5.15,
>>> and have all been runtime tested.
>>>
>>> Please queue up for the next 5.15-stable, thanks!
>>
>> Note, some of the io_uring patches you sent for 5.10 and 5.15 have
>> commits in the tree that are marked as "fixing" these commits.  I tried
>> to backport them as well, but got a lot of failures, which is why you
>> got those emails.  If they are not relevant, please feel free to ignore,
>> but if they are needed, maybe we also need them as well?
> 
> I'll go over those failures and send any in that are needed.

Sent the patches to you/Sasha/stable, thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux