On 1/22/23 7:46 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 10:52:10AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Two parts here: >> >> 1) The wakeup fix that went into 5.10-stable, but hadn't been done for >> 5.15-stable yet. It was the last 3 patches in the 5.10-stable backport >> for io_uring >> >> 2) Other patches that were marked for stable or should go to stable, but >> initially failed. >> >> This gets us to basically parity on the regression test front for 5.15, >> and have all been runtime tested. >> >> Please queue up for the next 5.15-stable, thanks! > > Note, some of the io_uring patches you sent for 5.10 and 5.15 have > commits in the tree that are marked as "fixing" these commits. I tried > to backport them as well, but got a lot of failures, which is why you > got those emails. If they are not relevant, please feel free to ignore, > but if they are needed, maybe we also need them as well? I'll go over those failures and send any in that are needed. -- Jens Axboe
