On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:50:40PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:34:20PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > Thanks! Do I understand correctly (from the annotations), that 3.12 > > needs only: > > 1/6 ipvs: avoid netns exit crash on ip_vs_conn_drop_conntrack > > 3/6 ipvs: Maintain all DSCP and ECN bits for ipv6 tun forwarding > > 5/6 ipvs: fix ipv6 hook registration for local replies > > ? > > Yes. All patches that contain: > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.12.x > > apply cleanly (according to my scripts) to 3.12 and I'll be happy if > you take them. > > From this question, I suspect I misinterpreted > Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt. > > I can include this in subject if you prefer so, but I will have to > send the same patch several times for each -stable kernel this needs > to be applied. > > Please, clarify so I can do better -stable submissions. Thanks! Hm, according to: Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt I should send now this to David via netdev. So please, withdraw. I'm going to stick to this procedure. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html