On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:34:20PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 09/25/2014, 06:52 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> >
> > [ upstream commit 2627b7e15c5064ddd5e578e4efd948d48d531a3f ]
> >
> > commit 8f4e0a18682d91 ("IPVS netns exit causes crash in conntrack")
> > added second ip_vs_conn_drop_conntrack call instead of just adding
> > the needed check. As result, the first call still can cause
> > crash on netns exit. Remove it.
> >
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.14.x
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.12.x
>
> Thanks! Do I understand correctly (from the annotations), that 3.12
> needs only:
> 1/6 ipvs: avoid netns exit crash on ip_vs_conn_drop_conntrack
> 3/6 ipvs: Maintain all DSCP and ECN bits for ipv6 tun forwarding
> 5/6 ipvs: fix ipv6 hook registration for local replies
> ?
Yes. All patches that contain:
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.12.x
apply cleanly (according to my scripts) to 3.12 and I'll be happy if
you take them.
>From this question, I suspect I misinterpreted
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt.
I can include this in subject if you prefer so, but I will have to
send the same patch several times for each -stable kernel this needs
to be applied.
Please, clarify so I can do better -stable submissions. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html