Re: please rebase the patch queue-6.1(btrfs: fix an error handling path in btrfs_defrag_leaves)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 04:42:35PM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:38:14PM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote:
> > > Hi, Sasha Levin
> > > 
> > > please rebase the patch queue-6.1(btrfs: fix an error handling path in btrfs_defrag_leaves)
> > > just like queue-6.0, and then drop its 8 depency patches.
> > > 
> > > the 2 of 8 depency patches are file rename, so it will make later depency patch become
> > > difficult?
> > > #btrfs-move-btrfs_get_block_group-helper-out-of-disk-.patch
> > > #btrfs-move-flush-related-definitions-to-space-info.h.patch
> > > #btrfs-move-btrfs_print_data_csum_error-into-inode.c.patch
> > > #btrfs-move-fs-wide-helpers-out-of-ctree.h.patch
> > > #btrfs-move-assert-helpers-out-of-ctree.h.patch
> > > #btrfs-move-the-printk-helpers-out-of-ctree.h.patch
> > > #**btrfs-rename-struct-funcs.c-to-accessors.c.patch
> > > #**btrfs-rename-tree-defrag.c-to-defrag.c.patch
> > > 
> > > and the patch(btrfs: fix an error handling path in btrfs_defrag_leaves) is small,
> > > so a rebase will be a good choice.
> > 
> > I do not understand, sorry, we can not rebase anything, that's not how
> > our patch queue works.
> > 
> > So what exactly do you want to see changed?  What patches dropped?  And
> > what added?
> 
> What I suggest:
> 
> 1)replace queue-6.1/btrfs-fix-an-error-handling-path-in-btrfs_defrag_lea.patch
>         with queue-6.0/btrfs-fix-an-error-handling-path-in-btrfs_defrag_lea.patch
> 
> 2) drop pathes in queue-6.1/
> btrfs-move-btrfs_get_block_group-helper-out-of-disk-.patch
> btrfs-move-flush-related-definitions-to-space-info.h.patch
> btrfs-move-btrfs_print_data_csum_error-into-inode.c.patch
> btrfs-move-fs-wide-helpers-out-of-ctree.h.patch
> btrfs-move-assert-helpers-out-of-ctree.h.patch
> btrfs-move-the-printk-helpers-out-of-ctree.h.patch
> btrfs-rename-struct-funcs.c-to-accessors.c.patch
> btrfs-rename-tree-defrag.c-to-defrag.c.patch

Right, I'd rather not add all the code moving patches to stable though I
understand that it could ease backporting. Many stable backports need to
be adapted to versions before/after the code moves so the work has to be
done anyway.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux