On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:38:14PM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote: > Hi, Sasha Levin > > please rebase the patch queue-6.1(btrfs: fix an error handling path in btrfs_defrag_leaves) > just like queue-6.0, and then drop its 8 depency patches. > > the 2 of 8 depency patches are file rename, so it will make later depency patch become > difficult? > #btrfs-move-btrfs_get_block_group-helper-out-of-disk-.patch > #btrfs-move-flush-related-definitions-to-space-info.h.patch > #btrfs-move-btrfs_print_data_csum_error-into-inode.c.patch > #btrfs-move-fs-wide-helpers-out-of-ctree.h.patch > #btrfs-move-assert-helpers-out-of-ctree.h.patch > #btrfs-move-the-printk-helpers-out-of-ctree.h.patch > #**btrfs-rename-struct-funcs.c-to-accessors.c.patch > #**btrfs-rename-tree-defrag.c-to-defrag.c.patch > > and the patch(btrfs: fix an error handling path in btrfs_defrag_leaves) is small, > so a rebase will be a good choice. I do not understand, sorry, we can not rebase anything, that's not how our patch queue works. So what exactly do you want to see changed? What patches dropped? And what added? thanks, greg k-h
