On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 08:50:03AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On 10/18/22 03:54, Dan Vacura wrote:
> > With the re-use of the previous completion status in 0d1c407b1a749
> > ("usb: dwc3: gadget: Return proper request status") it could be possible
> > that the next frame would also get dropped if the current frame has a
> > missed isoc error. Ensure that an interrupt is requested for the start
> > of a new frame.
> >
>
> Shouldn't the subject line says [PATCH v3 1/6]?
Yes. Clerical error on my side not updating this after resolving a
check-patch error... Not sure if it matters as this patch can exist on
it's own. Or if I can send this again with fixed subject line, but that
may confuse others, since there's no code difference.
>
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
>
