Re: Process question about dropped patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 03:55:03PM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote:
Hey Greg and Sasha - I'm starting to think through how I can monitor for
dropped stable patches that touch certain file paths in order to help
out with backporting. I've come across a few examples where Greg's
automated emails point out that the patch couldn't be applied to a
certain series but then the patch shows up in a future -rc release
without anyone submitting a fixed backport to the list. An example:

FAILED email: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/1664091338227131@xxxxxxxxx/
-rc review email: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20221003070722.143782710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Is this just a case of one of you manually doing the backports (or
dependency resolution) yourselves or are folks directly sending you
backports?

This isn't a problem for me, BTW. I just want to make sure that I
understand the process. Thanks!

If there's nothing on the mailing list, it's usually me fixing up
dropped patches.

In the example above, you can see I took an additional patch right
before the one you've linked to make things work.

I think that the only exception are the occasional "security" patches
that happen off list and take some time to get backported.

--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux