On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 08:45:18PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 12:07:39PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > On 30.09.22 14:26, Jerry Ling wrote: > > > > > > looks like someone has done it: > > > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2059823#p2059823 > > > > > > and the bisect points to: > > > > > > |# first bad commit: [fc6aff984b1c63d6b9e54f5eff9cc5ac5840bc8c] > > > drm/i915/bios: Split VBT data into per-panel vs. global parts Best, Jerry | > > > > FWIW, that's 3cf050762534 in mainline. Adding Ville, its author to the > > list of recipients. > > I definitely had no plans to backport any of that stuff, > but I guess the automagics did it anyway. > > Looks like stable is at least missing this pile of stuff: > 50759c13735d drm/i915/pps: Keep VDD enabled during eDP probe > 67090801489d drm/i915/pps: Reinit PPS delays after VBT has been fully parsed > 8e75e8f573e1 drm/i915/pps: Split PPS init+sanitize in two > 586294c3c186 drm/i915/pps: Stash away original BIOS programmed PPS delays > 89fcdf430599 drm/i915/pps: Don't apply quirks/etc. to the VBT PPS delays if they haven't been initialized > 60b02a09598f drm/i915/pps: Introduce pps_delays_valid() > > But dunno if even that is enough. > > This bug report is probably the same thing: > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/7013 Also cc intel-gfx... > > > > > Did anyone check if a revert on top of 5.19.12 works easily and solves > > the problem? > > > > And does anybody known if mainline affected, too? > > > > Ciao, Thorsten > > > > > > > On 9/30/22 07:11, Slade Watkins wrote: > > >> Hey Greg, > > >> > > >>> On Sep 30, 2022, at 1:59 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 06:37:48AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > >>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:26:25PM -0400, Jerry Ling wrote: > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> It has been reported by multiple users across a handful of distros > > >>>>> that > > >>>>> there seems to be regression on Framework laptop (which presumably > > >>>>> is not > > >>>>> that special in terms of mobo and display) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Ref: > > >>>>> https://community.frame.work/t/psa-dont-upgrade-to-linux-kernel-5-19-12-arch1-1-on-arch-linux-gen-11-model/23171 > > >>>> Can anyone do a 'git bisect' to find the offending commit? > > >>> Also, this works for me on a gen 12 framework laptop: > > >>> $ uname -a > > >>> Linux frame 5.19.12 #68 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Sep 30 07:02:33 > > >>> CEST 2022 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > >>> > > >>> so there's something odd with the older hardware? > > >>> > > >>> greg k-h > > >> Could be. Running git bisect for 5.19.11 and 5.19.12 (as suggested by > > >> the linked forum thread) returned nothing on gen 11 for me. > > >> > > >> This is very odd, > > >> -srw > > > > > > > > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
