On 30.09.22 14:26, Jerry Ling wrote: > > looks like someone has done it: > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2059823#p2059823 > > and the bisect points to: > > |# first bad commit: [fc6aff984b1c63d6b9e54f5eff9cc5ac5840bc8c] > drm/i915/bios: Split VBT data into per-panel vs. global parts Best, Jerry | FWIW, that's 3cf050762534 in mainline. Adding Ville, its author to the list of recipients. Did anyone check if a revert on top of 5.19.12 works easily and solves the problem? And does anybody known if mainline affected, too? Ciao, Thorsten > On 9/30/22 07:11, Slade Watkins wrote: >> Hey Greg, >> >>> On Sep 30, 2022, at 1:59 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 06:37:48AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:26:25PM -0400, Jerry Ling wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> It has been reported by multiple users across a handful of distros >>>>> that >>>>> there seems to be regression on Framework laptop (which presumably >>>>> is not >>>>> that special in terms of mobo and display) >>>>> >>>>> Ref: >>>>> https://community.frame.work/t/psa-dont-upgrade-to-linux-kernel-5-19-12-arch1-1-on-arch-linux-gen-11-model/23171 >>>> Can anyone do a 'git bisect' to find the offending commit? >>> Also, this works for me on a gen 12 framework laptop: >>> $ uname -a >>> Linux frame 5.19.12 #68 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Sep 30 07:02:33 >>> CEST 2022 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >>> so there's something odd with the older hardware? >>> >>> greg k-h >> Could be. Running git bisect for 5.19.11 and 5.19.12 (as suggested by >> the linked forum thread) returned nothing on gen 11 for me. >> >> This is very odd, >> -srw > >
