Re: [PATCH] mm/hmm: fault non-owner device private entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 03:56:32PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> If hmm_range_fault() is called with the HMM_PFN_REQ_FAULT flag and a
> device private PTE is found, the hmm_range::dev_private_owner page is
> used to determine if the device private page should not be faulted in.
> However, if the device private page is not owned by the caller,
> hmm_range_fault() returns an error instead of calling migrate_to_ram()
> to fault in the page.
> 
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: 76612d6ce4cc ("mm/hmm: reorganize how !pte_present is handled in hmm_vma_handle_pte()")
> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/hmm.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Should we have a test for this ?

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux