On 6/15/22 01:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > + .. list-table:: > + > + * - 'Not affected' > + - The processor is not vulnerable > + * - 'Vulnerable' > + - The processor is vulnerable, but no mitigation enabled > + * - 'Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode' > + - The processor is vulnerable, but microcode is not updated. The > + mitigation is enabled on a best effort basis. > + * - 'Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers' > + - The processor is vulnerable and the CPU buffer clearing mitigation is > + enabled. > + > +If the processor is vulnerable then the following information is appended to > +the above information: > + > + ======================== =========================================== > + 'SMT vulnerable' SMT is enabled > + 'SMT disabled' SMT is disabled > + 'SMT Host state unknown' Kernel runs in a VM, Host SMT state unknown > + ======================== =========================================== > + Why is list-table used in sysfs table instead of usual ASCII table in SMT vulnerabilities list above? I think using ASCII table in both cases is enough for the purpose. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
