Hi Chuang,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 17:06:33 +0800
Chuang W <nashuiliang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In a scenario where livepatch and aggrprobe coexist, if arm_kprobe()
> returns an error, ap.post_handler, while has been modified to
> p.post_handler, is not rolled back.
Would you mean 'coexist' on the same function?
>
> When ap.post_handler is not NULL (not rolled back), the caller (e.g.
> register_kprobe/enable_kprobe) of arm_kprobe_ftrace() will always fail.
It seems this explanation and the actual code does not
match. Can you tell me what actually you observed?
Thank you,
>
> Fixes: 12310e343755 ("kprobes: Propagate error from arm_kprobe_ftrace()")
> Signed-off-by: Chuang W <nashuiliang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index f214f8c088ed..0610b02a3a05 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1300,6 +1300,7 @@ static int register_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *orig_p, struct kprobe *p)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> struct kprobe *ap = orig_p;
> + kprobe_post_handler_t old_post_handler = NULL;
>
> cpus_read_lock();
>
> @@ -1351,6 +1352,9 @@ static int register_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *orig_p, struct kprobe *p)
>
> /* Copy the insn slot of 'p' to 'ap'. */
> copy_kprobe(ap, p);
> +
> + /* save the old post_handler */
> + old_post_handler = ap->post_handler;
> ret = add_new_kprobe(ap, p);
>
> out:
> @@ -1365,6 +1369,7 @@ static int register_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *orig_p, struct kprobe *p)
> ret = arm_kprobe(ap);
> if (ret) {
> ap->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
> + ap->post_handler = old_post_handler;
> list_del_rcu(&p->list);
> synchronize_rcu();
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
