Re: Fix issues caused by lack of x86 LPI support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:09:30PM +0000, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> [Public]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> There are a variety of x86 systems that advertise LPI support and as part of negotiation with firmware they don't end up using C-states
> in certain circumstances.  This leads to higher runtime power consumption and also failure to enter s2idle. 
> 
> In mainline there have been changes to block that behavior.  Can you please backport these two commits from mainline?
> commit 01f6c7338ce267959975da65d86ba34f44d54220 ("cpuidle: PSCI: Move the `has_lpi` check to the beginning of the function")
> commit eb087f305919ee8169ad65665610313e74260463 ("ACPI: processor idle: Check for architectural support for LPI")
> 
> This should go to 5.15.y and later stable kernels.

Queued for 5.4 and newer kernels.  If you want this backported to older
ones, please provide a working set of patches.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux