Re: CVE-2020-16120 and CVE-2021-3428

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 01:21:02PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:40:51PM +0200, achtol wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > It seems the fix commits for a couple of CVEs have not been cherry picked in
> > the current linux-5.4.y branch (v5.4.188, currently):
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > CVE-2020-16120:
> > 
> > <https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-16120> references the following
> > mainline commits:
> > 
> >     d1d04ef8572bc8c22265057bd3d5a79f223f8f52 "ovl: stack file ops" (break
> > commit)
> >     56230d956739b9cb1cbde439d76227d77979a04d "ovl: verify permissions in
> > ovl_path_open()"
> >     48bd024b8a40d73ad6b086de2615738da0c7004f "ovl: switch to mounter creds
> > in readdir"
> >     05acefb4872dae89e772729efb194af754c877e8 "ovl: check permission to open
> > real file"
> >     b6650dab404c701d7fe08a108b746542a934da84 "ovl: do not fail because of
> > O_NOATIME"
> > 
> > The CVE description says the last commit in the list above fixes a
> > regression introduced by these two commits:
> > 
> >     130fdbc3d1f9966dd4230709c30f3768bccd3065 "ovl: pass correct flags for
> > opening real directory"
> >     292f902a40c11f043a5ca1305a114da0e523eaa3 "ovl: call secutiry hook in
> > ovl_real_ioctl()"
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > CVE-2021-3428:
> > 
> > According to <https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173485>, the
> > mainline fix commits are:
> > 
> >     d176b1f62f24 "ext4: handle error of ext4_setup_system_zone() on remount"
> >     bf9a379d0980 "ext4: don't allow overlapping system zones"
> >     ce9f24cccdc0 "ext4: check journal inode extents more carefully"
> > 
> > Of these, only the first two have been cherry-picked.
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Half of these commits may be cherry-picked without a conflict.
> 
> Which half?
> 
> > I wonder why
> > they have not been applied and cannot find any discussion about them on this
> > mailing list. Is it an oversight? Or because the v5.4 line is not affected?
> > Some other reason?
> 
> If you can provide a working set of patches backported, I will be glad
> to review them and apply them if needed.

Given the lack of response here, I am guessing these really are not
needed for 5.4 and older so will drop this from my queue.

If that is not the case, please send a working set of backports.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux