Re: New v3.15-stable-queue build failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:21:59PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 07/14/2014 10:02 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 07:21:10PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>On 07/14/2014 04:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 04:27:41PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>>>On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 03:58:31PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>>Building um:defconfig ... failed
> >>>>>--------------
> >>>>>Error log:
> >>>>>init/main.c: In function 'start_kernel':
> >>>>>init/main.c:622:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'init_espfix_bsp' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >>>>>cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Looks like it doesn't like 'x86-64, espfix: Don't leak bits 31:16 of %esp returning to 16-bit stack'.
> >>>>
> >>>>Looks like I need commit e1fe9ed8d2a4937510d0d60e20705035c2609aea as
> >>>>well, I'll go queue that up and see if it fixes this.
> >>>
> >>>Nope, that just broke the build in worse ways...  Which I totally can't
> >>>understand, odd.
> >>>
> >>>hpa, any ideas?
> >>>
> >>
> >>The um:defconfig build now fails in 3.4, 3.10, 3,14, and 3.15.
> >
> >Yes, hpa's offending patch is now in all of those trees :)
> >
> >Is Linus's tree also failing to build um in the same way?  I don't see
> >anything I've missed, do you?
> >
> 
> v3.16-rc5 is fine.
> 
> I found e1fe9ed8d2a493 as well. But the espfix changes seem to be more extensive.
> From Linus' merge:
> 
> Revert "x86-64, modify_ldt: Make support for 16-bit segments a runtime option"
> x86, espfix: Make it possible to disable 16-bit support
> x86, espfix: Make espfix64 a Kconfig option, fix UML
> x86, espfix: Fix broken header guard
> x86, espfix: Move espfix definitions into a separate header file
> x86-32, espfix: Remove filter for espfix32 due to race
> x86-64, espfix: Don't leak bits 31:16 of %esp returning to 16-bit stack

Ok, let me go rework this whole series and see if I can resolve it.  I
missed the fact that there were older patches, I was just looking for
"newer" ones instead...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]