On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 07:21:10PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 07/14/2014 04:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 04:27:41PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >>On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 03:58:31PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>>Building um:defconfig ... failed > >>>-------------- > >>>Error log: > >>>init/main.c: In function 'start_kernel': > >>>init/main.c:622:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'init_espfix_bsp' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > >>>cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > >>> > >>>Looks like it doesn't like 'x86-64, espfix: Don't leak bits 31:16 of %esp returning to 16-bit stack'. > >> > >>Looks like I need commit e1fe9ed8d2a4937510d0d60e20705035c2609aea as > >>well, I'll go queue that up and see if it fixes this. > > > >Nope, that just broke the build in worse ways... Which I totally can't > >understand, odd. > > > >hpa, any ideas? > > > > The um:defconfig build now fails in 3.4, 3.10, 3,14, and 3.15. Yes, hpa's offending patch is now in all of those trees :) Is Linus's tree also failing to build um in the same way? I don't see anything I've missed, do you? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html