Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sat, 2022-04-02 at 14:27 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> >> @@ -2591,12 +2602,6 @@ static void ath_tx_rc_status(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_buf *bf, >> hw->max_rate_tries; >> } >> >> - for (i = tx_rateindex + 1; i < hw->max_rates; i++) { > > might want to drop that blank line too :) > >> - tx_info->status.rates[i].count = 0; >> - tx_info->status.rates[i].idx = -1; >> - } >> - >> - tx_info->status.rates[tx_rateindex].count = ts->ts_longretry + 1; >> } > > since there's nothing else. Hmm, fair point; Kalle, I don't suppose I could trouble you for a fixup when committing? :) -Toke