On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 04:56:11PM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just found the commit in 5.10 stable kernel.
>
> stable-linux> git tag --sort=taggerdate --contain
> 8a3fc32b322cc3081dd3569047c9834f496b4ab0 | head -1
> v5.10.17
>
> commit 8a3fc32b322cc3081dd3569047c9834f496b4ab0
> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu Feb 4 18:25:37 2021 +0100
>
> cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies
>
> commit 3c55e94c0adea4a5389c4b80f6ae9927dd6a4501 upstream.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Fixes: 41ea667227ba ("x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD
> systems")
> Fixes: 976df7e5730e ("x86, sched: Use midpoint of max_boost and max_P
> for frequency invariance on AMD EPYC")
> Fixes: db865272d9c4 ("cpufreq: Avoid configuring old governors as
> default with intel_pstate")
>
> Except db865272d9c4 was applied in v5.10-rc2, the others (41ea667227ba and
> 976df7e5730e)
> were first appeared in v5.11-rc1.
>
> linux> git tag --sort=taggerdate --contain 41ea667227ba | head -1
> v5.11-rc1
> linux> git tag --sort=taggerdate --contain 976df7e5730e | head -1
> v5.11-rc1
> linux> git tag --sort=taggerdate --contain db865272d9c4 | head -1
> v5.10-rc2
>
> So I am wondering if the mentioned commit is suitable for 5.10 stable
> kernel, or what am I missing?
Is it causing a problem for you? What is the issue with having it in
the 5.10.y tree?
thanks,
greg k-h
