question about one acpi-cpufreq commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I just found the commit in 5.10 stable kernel.

stable-linux> git tag --sort=taggerdate --contain 8a3fc32b322cc3081dd3569047c9834f496b4ab0 | head -1
v5.10.17

commit 8a3fc32b322cc3081dd3569047c9834f496b4ab0
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Feb 4 18:25:37 2021 +0100

    cpufreq: ACPI: Extend frequency tables to cover boost frequencies

    commit 3c55e94c0adea4a5389c4b80f6ae9927dd6a4501 upstream.

   [ ... ]

    Fixes: 41ea667227ba ("x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD systems")     Fixes: 976df7e5730e ("x86, sched: Use midpoint of max_boost and max_P for frequency invariance on AMD EPYC")     Fixes: db865272d9c4 ("cpufreq: Avoid configuring old governors as default with intel_pstate")

Except db865272d9c4 was applied in v5.10-rc2, the others (41ea667227ba and 976df7e5730e)
were first appeared in v5.11-rc1.

linux> git tag --sort=taggerdate --contain 41ea667227ba | head -1
v5.11-rc1
linux> git tag --sort=taggerdate --contain 976df7e5730e | head -1
v5.11-rc1
linux> git tag --sort=taggerdate --contain db865272d9c4 | head -1
v5.10-rc2

So I am wondering if the mentioned commit is suitable for 5.10 stable kernel, or what am I missing?

Thanks,
Guoqing



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux