Re: [PATCH] Revert "xfrm: state and policy should fail if XFRMA_IF_ID 0"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 01:19:19PM +0100, Kai Lueke wrote:
> I forgot to CC stable@ when submitting, doing it now:
> Can this be picked for the next round of stable kernels (down to 5.10)?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a3d9001b4e287fc043e5539d03d71a32ab114bcb
> 
> Thanks,
> Kai
> 
> On 07.03.2022 09:22, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 03:55:10PM +0100, kailueke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> From: Kai Lueke <kailueke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> This reverts commit 68ac0f3810e76a853b5f7b90601a05c3048b8b54 because ID
> >> 0 was meant to be used for configuring the policy/state without
> >> matching for a specific interface (e.g., Cilium is affected, see
> >> https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/18789 and
> >> https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/19019).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kai Lueke <kailueke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Applied, thanks Kai!

I will pick it up for the next round of releases after these go out.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux