Re: [PATCH] Revert "xfrm: state and policy should fail if XFRMA_IF_ID 0"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I forgot to CC stable@ when submitting, doing it now:
Can this be picked for the next round of stable kernels (down to 5.10)?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a3d9001b4e287fc043e5539d03d71a32ab114bcb

Thanks,
Kai

On 07.03.2022 09:22, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 03:55:10PM +0100, kailueke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Kai Lueke <kailueke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This reverts commit 68ac0f3810e76a853b5f7b90601a05c3048b8b54 because ID
>> 0 was meant to be used for configuring the policy/state without
>> matching for a specific interface (e.g., Cilium is affected, see
>> https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/18789 and
>> https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/19019).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kai Lueke <kailueke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Applied, thanks Kai!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux