On 24/01/2022 17:27:16+0100, Mateusz Jończyk wrote: > W dniu 24.01.2022 o 15:52, Greg KH pisze: > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 03:45:30PM +0100, Mateusz Jończyk wrote: > >> W dniu 24.01.2022 o 14:08, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx pisze: > >>> The patch below does not apply to the 5.16-stable tree. > >>> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > >>> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > >>> id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > >>> > >>> thanks, > >>> > >>> greg k-h > >> Wait, this patch was not intended for submission into stable yet, at least not in this form. > >> Why did it end up in the stable queue? > > Because it was marked with a "Fixes:" tag and I reviewed it and it > > looked like it actually fixed an issue. > > > > Is this not the case? > > Yes, that's correct. But I'm afraid that this patch will cause regressions on some systems. > (Mr Alexandre Belloni said something similar of my series). So I'd like to wait till at least Linux 5.17 (final) is > released to see if it causes any trouble. > Well, it will be in 5.17, any regression it causes will have to be fixed and we can then backport the fix. -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
