On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 01:05:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 14:21 -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > [...] > > I looked at this some more. It seems like my v2 backport may be the > > most suitable for the releases mentioned in the subject line, but I'd > > like to get additional feedback. > > > > The lines added by commit a5065eb just get removed by commit b7a77235. > > Also, if I apply commit a5065eb, it will also require a backport to pull > > in just a piece of code(Remove snd_printk() and add dev_dbg()) from > > another prior commit(0ba41d9). No backport would be needed at all if I > > cherry-pick 0ba41d9, but that commit seems to have too may changes for a > > stable release. > > Keep the changes squashed together if you like, but do include both > commit hashes and commit messages. No, I don't want to see "squashed together" patches, please keep them as close to the original patch as possible. It saves time in the long run, trust me... greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html