On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 14:21 -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote: [...] > I looked at this some more. It seems like my v2 backport may be the > most suitable for the releases mentioned in the subject line, but I'd > like to get additional feedback. > > The lines added by commit a5065eb just get removed by commit b7a77235. > Also, if I apply commit a5065eb, it will also require a backport to pull > in just a piece of code(Remove snd_printk() and add dev_dbg()) from > another prior commit(0ba41d9). No backport would be needed at all if I > cherry-pick 0ba41d9, but that commit seems to have too may changes for a > stable release. Keep the changes squashed together if you like, but do include both commit hashes and commit messages. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Who are all these weirdos? - David Bowie, reading IRC for the first time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part