On 9/16/21 9:03 AM, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
On środa, 15 września 2021 10:08:41 CEST Marek Vasut wrote:
+#define DEV_OPMODE_PARAM_DESC \
+ __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_WIFI_ALONE) "[Wi-Fi alone], " \
+ __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_BT_ALONE) "[BT classic alone], " \
+ __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_BT_LE_ALONE) "[BT LE], "
\
+ __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_BT_DUAL) "[BT Dual], "
\
+ __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_STA_BT) "[Wi-Fi STA + BT
classic], " \
+ __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_STA_BT_LE) "[Wi-Fi STA + BT LE], " \
+ __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_STA_BT_DUAL) "[Wi-Fi STA + BT
classic + BT LE], " \
+ __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_AP_BT) "[AP + BT classic], "
\
+ __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_AP_BT_DUAL) "[AP + BT classic + BT LE]"
There's still some inconsistency in mode naming - how about:
- Wi-Fi STA
This mode is also AP capable
- BT classic
- BT LE
- BT classic + BT LE
- Wi-Fi STA + BT classic
- Wi-Fi STA + BT LE
- Wi-Fi STA + BT classic + BT LE
- Wi-Fi AP + BT classic
- Wi-Fi AP + BT classic + BT LE
"alone" could be added to the first three modes (you missed it in BT LE).
I can add the alone consistently, yes -- that's the point of the first
three modes, that the "other" radio is disabled by the firmware.
