On środa, 15 września 2021 10:08:41 CEST Marek Vasut wrote: > +#define DEV_OPMODE_PARAM_DESC \ > + __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_WIFI_ALONE) "[Wi-Fi alone], " \ > + __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_BT_ALONE) "[BT classic alone], " \ > + __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_BT_LE_ALONE) "[BT LE], " \ > + __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_BT_DUAL) "[BT Dual], " \ > + __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_STA_BT) "[Wi-Fi STA + BT classic], " \ > + __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_STA_BT_LE) "[Wi-Fi STA + BT LE], " \ > + __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_STA_BT_DUAL) "[Wi-Fi STA + BT classic + BT LE], " \ > + __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_AP_BT) "[AP + BT classic], " \ > + __stringify(DEV_OPMODE_AP_BT_DUAL) "[AP + BT classic + BT LE]" There's still some inconsistency in mode naming - how about: - Wi-Fi STA - BT classic - BT LE - BT classic + BT LE - Wi-Fi STA + BT classic - Wi-Fi STA + BT LE - Wi-Fi STA + BT classic + BT LE - Wi-Fi AP + BT classic - Wi-Fi AP + BT classic + BT LE "alone" could be added to the first three modes (you missed it in BT LE). Cheers, Sebastian
