RE: [PATCH 5.14 018/334] nbd: add the check to prevent overflow in __nbd_ioctl()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



...
>          case NBD_SET_SIZE:
>                  return nbd_set_size(nbd, arg, config->blksize);
>          case NBD_SET_SIZE_BLOCKS:
> -               if (check_mul_overflow((loff_t)arg, config->blksize,
> &bytesize))
> +               if (arg && (LLONG_MAX / arg <= config->blksize))
>                          return -EINVAL;
> -               return nbd_set_size(nbd, bytesize, config->blksize);
> +               return nbd_set_size(nbd, arg * config->blksize,
> +                                   config->blksize);

Shouldn't there just be sanity bound checks on 'config->blksize' and
'arg' so that the product is never going to overflow?

It isn't as though any values near the overflow limit are sane.

I suspect you could check config->blksize <= 64k && arg <= 32k
and even that would be generous.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux