Re: [PATCH] x86: numa: drop ZONE_ALIGN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> > > The zone should not cross the 8M boundary?
> >
> > Yes, but the question is: why?
> 
> zones need to be aligned so that the huge pages order and other page
> orders allocated from the page allocator are at their "natural alignment".
> Otherwise huge pages cannot be mapped properly and various I/O devices
> may encounter issues if they rely on the natural alignment.
> 

Any reason not to align to HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER on x86 instead of 
ZONE_ALIGN?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]