On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:57:58PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > On 8/13/21 9:55 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > commit 71330842ff93ae67a066c1fa68d75672527312fa upstream. > > > > > > Rename LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ into LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL so we have naming > > > more consistent with a LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER option that we are > > > adding. > > > > As far as I can tell, next bpf patch does not depend on this one and > > we don't need it in 5.10. (Likely same situation with 5.13). > > Yeah, it's nice to have for consistency given also small as well, but > also fully okay to drop it as there shouldn't be any conflict. > Ok, now dropped, thanks. greg k-h
