Hi Pavel,
On 8/13/21 9:55 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 71330842ff93ae67a066c1fa68d75672527312fa upstream.
Rename LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ into LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ_KERNEL so we have naming
more consistent with a LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER option that we are
adding.
As far as I can tell, next bpf patch does not depend on this one and
we don't need it in 5.10. (Likely same situation with 5.13).
Yeah, it's nice to have for consistency given also small as well, but
also fully okay to drop it as there shouldn't be any conflict.
Thanks,
Daniel
