Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We ran tests on this kernel:

commit 8ac4b1deedaa507b5d0f46316e7f32004dd99cd1 (HEAD ->
rc/linux-5.10.y, stable_rc/linux-5.10.y)
Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Mon Apr 12 10:40:10 2021 +0200

    Linux 5.10.30-rc1

32/32 test passed, 0 failed, 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Specific tests run:

 (01/32) 32ltp.py:LTP.test_nptl:  PASS (6.55 s)
 (02/32) 32ltp.py:LTP.test_math:  PASS (2.05 s)
 (03/32) 32ltp.py:LTP.test_hugetlb:  PASS (0.07 s)
 (04/32) 32ltp.py:LTP.test_ipc:  PASS (20.08 s)
 (05/32) 32ltp.py:LTP.test_uevent:  PASS (0.05 s)
 (06/32) 32ltp.py:LTP.test_containers:  PASS (36.71 s)
 (07/32) 32ltp.py:LTP.test_filecaps:  PASS (0.11 s)
 (08/32) 32ltp.py:LTP.test_hyperthreading:  PASS (71.18 s)
 (09/32) 32kpatch.sh:  PASS (12.59 s)
 (10/32) 32perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_help:  PASS (0.07 s)
 (11/32) 32perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_version:  PASS (0.06 s)
 (12/32) 32perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_list:  PASS (0.39 s)
 (13/32) 32perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_record:  PASS (4.71 s)
 (14/32) 32perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_kallsyms:  PASS (0.31 s)
 (15/32) 32perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_annotate:  PASS (6.86 s)
 (16/32) 32perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_evlist:  PASS (0.07 s)
 (17/32) 32perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_script:  PASS (0.49 s)
 (18/32) 32perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_stat:  PASS (3.22 s)
 (19/32) 32perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_bench:  PASS (0.07 s)
 (20/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sysctl:  PASS (0.19 s)
 (21/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_size:  PASS (0.02 s)
 (22/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sync:  PASS (0.46 s)
 (23/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_capabilities:  PASS (0.03 s)
 (24/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_x86:  PASS (0.28 s)
 (25/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_pidfd:  PASS (13.01 s)
 (26/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_membarrier:  PASS (0.22 s)
 (27/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sigaltstack:  PASS (0.03 s)
 (28/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_tmpfs:  PASS (0.03 s)
 (29/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_user:  PASS (0.02 s)
 (30/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sched:  PASS (0.03 s)
 (31/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timens:  PASS (0.09 s)
 (32/32) 32kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timers:  PASS (555.01 s)
RESULTS    : PASS 32 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT
0 | CANCEL 0

Tested-by: Patrick McCormick <pmccormick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:08 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/12/2021 1:38 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release.
> > There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >       https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.30-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
>
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> --
> Florian



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux