Re: PASS: stable-rc/linux-5.10.y (v5.10.29-rc1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No problem.

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 2:25 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 10:18:21PM -0700, Patrick Mccormick wrote:
> > We ran tests on this kernel:
> >
> > commit 18f507c37f338c5d30f58839060d3af0d8504162 (HEAD ->
> > rc/linux-5.10.y, stable_rc/linux-5.10.y)
> > Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Fri Apr 9 11:53:03 2021 +0200
> >
> >     Linux 5.10.29-rc1
> >
> > 32/32 test passed, 0 failed, 0 errors, 0 warnings.
> >
> > Specific tests run:
> >
> > (01/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_nptl:  PASS (6.52 s)
> >  (02/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_math:  PASS (2.13 s)
> >  (03/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_hugetlb:  PASS (0.08 s)
> >  (04/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_ipc:  PASS (20.09 s)
> >  (05/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_uevent:  PASS (0.05 s)
> >  (06/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_containers:  PASS (36.76 s)
> >  (07/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_filecaps:  PASS (0.11 s)
> >  (08/32) ltp.py:LTP.test_hyperthreading:  PASS (71.19 s)
> >  (09/32) kpatch.sh:  PASS (11.64 s)
> >  (10/32) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_help:  PASS (0.08 s)
> >  (11/32) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_version:  PASS (0.06 s)
> >  (12/32) perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_list:  PASS (0.40 s)
> >  (13/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_record:  PASS (4.74 s)
> >  (14/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_kallsyms:  PASS (0.26 s)
> >  (15/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_annotate:  PASS (5.15 s)
> >  (16/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_evlist:  PASS (0.07 s)
> >  (17/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_script:  PASS (0.50 s)
> >  (18/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_stat:  PASS (3.22 s)
> >  (19/32) perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_bench:  PASS (0.07 s)
> >  (20/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sysctl:  PASS (0.03 s)
> >  (21/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_size:  PASS (0.02 s)
> >  (22/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sync:  PASS (0.46 s)
> >  (23/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_capabilities:  PASS (0.03 s)
> >  (24/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_x86:  PASS (0.26 s)
> >  (25/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_pidfd:  PASS (13.06 s)
> >  (26/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_membarrier:  PASS (0.18 s)
> >  (27/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sigaltstack:  PASS (0.03 s)
> >  (28/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_tmpfs:  PASS (0.02 s)
> >  (29/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_user:  PASS (0.02 s)
> >  (30/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sched:  PASS (0.03 s)
> >  (31/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timens:  PASS (0.09 s)
> >  (32/32) kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timers:  PASS (554.44 s)
> > RESULTS    : PASS 32 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT
> > 0 | CANCEL 0
> >
> > Tested-by: pmccormick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Any chance you can make this a response to the -rc release announcement
> and provide the name correctly for the tested-by: line in the future so
> that I can include it in the release commit?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux