On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 04:35:40PM +0300, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> On 4/5/21 11:53 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 705e9195187d85249fbb0eaa844b1604a98fbc9a ]
> >
> > The 'reason' variable in module_sig_check() points to 3 strings across
> > the *switch* statement, all needlessly starting with the same text.
> > Let's put the starting text into the pr_notice() call -- it saves 21
> > bytes of the object code (x86 gcc 10.2.1).
> >
> > Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/module.c | 9 +++++----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> > index ab1f97cfe18d..9fe3e9b85348 100644
> > --- a/kernel/module.c
> > +++ b/kernel/module.c
> > @@ -2908,16 +2908,17 @@ static int module_sig_check(struct load_info *info, int flags)
> > * enforcing, certain errors are non-fatal.
> > */
> > case -ENODATA:
> > - reason = "Loading of unsigned module";
> > + reason = "unsigned module";
> > goto decide;
> > case -ENOPKG:
> > - reason = "Loading of module with unsupported crypto";
> > + reason = "module with unsupported crypto";
> > goto decide;
> > case -ENOKEY:
> > - reason = "Loading of module with unavailable key";
> > + reason = "module with unavailable key";
> > decide:
> > if (is_module_sig_enforced()) {
> > - pr_notice("%s is rejected\n", reason);
> > + pr_notice("%s: loading of %s is rejected\n",
> > + info->name, reason);
>
> Mhm, in 5.4 there was no printing of 'info->name'...
Is that now a problem?
thanks,
greg k-h
