On 4/5/21 11:53 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [ Upstream commit 705e9195187d85249fbb0eaa844b1604a98fbc9a ]
>
> The 'reason' variable in module_sig_check() points to 3 strings across
> the *switch* statement, all needlessly starting with the same text.
> Let's put the starting text into the pr_notice() call -- it saves 21
> bytes of the object code (x86 gcc 10.2.1).
>
> Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/module.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> index ab1f97cfe18d..9fe3e9b85348 100644
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -2908,16 +2908,17 @@ static int module_sig_check(struct load_info *info, int flags)
> * enforcing, certain errors are non-fatal.
> */
> case -ENODATA:
> - reason = "Loading of unsigned module";
> + reason = "unsigned module";
> goto decide;
> case -ENOPKG:
> - reason = "Loading of module with unsupported crypto";
> + reason = "module with unsupported crypto";
> goto decide;
> case -ENOKEY:
> - reason = "Loading of module with unavailable key";
> + reason = "module with unavailable key";
> decide:
> if (is_module_sig_enforced()) {
> - pr_notice("%s is rejected\n", reason);
> + pr_notice("%s: loading of %s is rejected\n",
> + info->name, reason);
Mhm, in 5.4 there was no printing of 'info->name'...
[...]
MBR, Sergey
