On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:24:13PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 01:10:09PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 07:12:55PM +0100, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
> > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> > >
> > > No need for v5.4.
> > >
> > > Please, also drop
> > > gpio-pca953x-set-irq-type-when-handle-intel-galileo-gen-2.patch
> > > gpiolib-acpi-allow-to-find-gpioint-resource-by-name-and-index.patch
> > >
> > > from 5.4-stable queue, thanks!
> >
> > Why? If you look at the first commit above, it says:
> > Fixes: ba8c90c61847 ("gpio: pca953x: Override IRQ for one of the expanders on Galileo Gen 2")
> >
> > which is in the 5.4.52 kernel release. So why shouldn't it go there?
> >
> > Same goes for the
> > gpiolib-acpi-allow-to-find-gpioint-resource-by-name-and-index.patch
> > patch.
> >
> > Is your marking of the "Fixes:" tags incorrect somehow?
> >
> > confused,
>
> It has also Depends-on which points out that the regression only visible when
> that commit is in the tree.
>
> If you want to see them in v5.4, I can backport the series.
Since the other two in your queue, you may try to use this one, which I have
sent for v5.10.y, but it seems good enough for v5.4.
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20210312121542.67389-1-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
Thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
