On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 01:10:09PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 07:12:55PM +0100, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
> > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> >
> > No need for v5.4.
> >
> > Please, also drop
> > gpio-pca953x-set-irq-type-when-handle-intel-galileo-gen-2.patch
> > gpiolib-acpi-allow-to-find-gpioint-resource-by-name-and-index.patch
> >
> > from 5.4-stable queue, thanks!
>
> Why? If you look at the first commit above, it says:
> Fixes: ba8c90c61847 ("gpio: pca953x: Override IRQ for one of the expanders on Galileo Gen 2")
>
> which is in the 5.4.52 kernel release. So why shouldn't it go there?
>
> Same goes for the
> gpiolib-acpi-allow-to-find-gpioint-resource-by-name-and-index.patch
> patch.
>
> Is your marking of the "Fixes:" tags incorrect somehow?
>
> confused,
It has also Depends-on which points out that the regression only visible when
that commit is in the tree.
If you want to see them in v5.4, I can backport the series.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
