On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 14:28 -0400, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 02:18:30PM -0400, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:32:56PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > On 14/05/01, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The patch below does not apply to the 3.14-stable tree.
> > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> > >
> > > Odd. It applies to my checkout of 3.14.y at tag 3.14.2 with:
> > >
> > > patching file kernel/audit.c
> > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1829 (offset 10 lines).
> > > patching file kernel/auditsc.c
> > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 459 (offset -6 lines).
> > >
> > > Are the offsets the problem?
> >
> > I don't know what the problem was, but now it applies. Very strange,
> > maybe it was depending on something that I hadn't applied yet?
>
> Oh wait, now I remember, it breaks the build as-is, that's why I
> rejected it :)
>
> here's the errors it causes:
>
> kernel/audit.c:1835:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘task_ppid_nr’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> 3.14 doesn't have task_ppid_nr(). Is there some patch I should take
> before this patch is applied?
commit ad36d28293936b03d6b7996e9d6aadfd73c0eb08 ('pid: get pid_t ppid of
task in init_pid_ns')
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
- Albert Einstein
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part