On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 02:18:30PM -0400, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:32:56PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > On 14/05/01, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 3.14-stable tree. > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > Odd. It applies to my checkout of 3.14.y at tag 3.14.2 with: > > > > patching file kernel/audit.c > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1829 (offset 10 lines). > > patching file kernel/auditsc.c > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 459 (offset -6 lines). > > > > Are the offsets the problem? > > I don't know what the problem was, but now it applies. Very strange, > maybe it was depending on something that I hadn't applied yet? Oh wait, now I remember, it breaks the build as-is, that's why I rejected it :) here's the errors it causes: kernel/audit.c:1835:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘task_ppid_nr’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 3.14 doesn't have task_ppid_nr(). Is there some patch I should take before this patch is applied? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html