On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:11:15AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 6:41 AM <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > > > > From a95881d6aa2c000e3649f27a1a7329cf356e6bb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 19:16:23 -0800 > > Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Properly clear "intr_ack_high" interrupts when > > unmasking > > For 5.10, we should just take these 4 patches: > > cf9d052aa600 pinctrl: qcom: Don't clear pending interrupts when enabling > a95881d6aa2c pinctrl: qcom: Properly clear "intr_ack_high" interrupts > when unmasking > 4079d35fa4fc pinctrl: qcom: No need to read-modify-write the interrupt status > a82e537807d5 pinctrl: qcom: Allow SoCs to specify a GPIO function that's not 0 > > If we apply all 4 together we should be good and no backport should be needed. That worked, thanks! greg k-h
