Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Properly clear "intr_ack_high" interrupts when" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 6:41 AM <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
> From a95881d6aa2c000e3649f27a1a7329cf356e6bb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 19:16:23 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Properly clear "intr_ack_high" interrupts when
>  unmasking

For 5.10, we should just take these 4 patches:

cf9d052aa600 pinctrl: qcom: Don't clear pending interrupts when enabling
a95881d6aa2c pinctrl: qcom: Properly clear "intr_ack_high" interrupts
when unmasking
4079d35fa4fc pinctrl: qcom: No need to read-modify-write the interrupt status
a82e537807d5 pinctrl: qcom: Allow SoCs to specify a GPIO function that's not 0

If we apply all 4 together we should be good and no backport should be needed.

-Doug



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux