Hi Jakub,
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 10:52 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 03:12:21 +0100 Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 3:09 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 02:25:43AM +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > > > Enable GSWIP_MII_CFG_EN also for internal PHYs to make traffic flow.
> > > > Without this the PHY link is detected properly and ethtool statistics
> > > > for TX are increasing but there's no RX traffic coming in.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 14fceff4771e51 ("net: dsa: Add Lantiq / Intel DSA driver for vrx200")
> > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Hi Martin
> > >
> > > No need to Cc: stable. David or Jakub will handle the backport to
> > > stable. You should however set the subject to [PATCH net 1/2] and
> > > base the patches on the net tree, not net-next.
> > do you recommend re-sending these patches and changing the subject?
> > the lantiq_gswip.c driver is identical in -net and -net-next and so
> > the patch will apply fine in both cases
>
> Resend is pretty much always a safe bet. But since as you said trees
> are identical at the moment I made an exception applied as is :)
awesome, thank you! :-)
Best regards,
Martin
