On 2020/11/04 18:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 09:21:27AM +0000, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 2020/11/04 18:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:10:15AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:29:14PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>>>> commit f9c9104288da543cd64f186f9e2fba389f415630 upstream.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the cae of the REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL operation, the command sector is
>>>>> ignored and the operation is applied to all sequential zones. For these
>>>>> commands, tracing the effect of the command using the command sector to
>>>>> determine the target zone is thus incorrect.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix null_zone_mgmt() zone condition tracing in the case of
>>>>> REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET_ALL to apply tracing to all sequential zones that are
>>>>> not already empty.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 766c3297d7e1 ("null_blk: add trace in null_blk_zoned.c")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>
>>>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/block/null_blk_zoned.c | 14 ++++++++------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> Now queued up, thanks.
>>>
>>> Wait, no, I'll delay this one until the next round as it's not fixing
>>> something introduced in this -rc series.
>>
>> Yes, that problem is older.
>> The lock fix I sent goes on top of this one though. I can send the backport for
>> the lock fix without this patch applied. Is that OK ?
>
> If the order of the patches is needed, then yes, I can take both, please
> submit them as a patch series so that I know this is needed.
OK. Sending that. Note that I still do not see Kanchan patch applied in stable
5.9.y branch, so I will do the backport assuming it is applied. Or I can send
all 3 patches as the series. Which do you prefer ?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
