On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:34:52AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 9/16/20 9:26 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:26:48AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > On 9/16/20 12:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:54:24PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > > > On 9/15/20 3:06 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > > > > On 9/15/20 8:11 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.10 release. > > > > > > > There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:06:12 +0000. > > > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.8.10-rc1.gz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > > > > > > linux-5.8.y > > > > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Compiled and booted fine. wifi died: > > > > > > > > > > > > ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: could not init core (-110) > > > > > > ath10k_pci 0000:02:00.0: could not probe fw (-110) > > > > > > > > > > > > This is regression from 5.8.9 and 5.9-rc5 works just fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > I will try to bisect later this evening to see if I can isolate the > > > > > > commit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The following commit is what caused ath10k_pci driver problem > > > > > that killed wifi. > > > > > > > > > > Prateek Sood <prsood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > firmware_loader: fix memory leak for paged buffer > > > > > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/commit/?h=linux-5.8.y&id=ec0a59266c9c9f46037efd3dcc0323973e102271 > > > > > > > > Ugh, that's not good, is this also a problem in 5.9-rc5 as well? For > > > > reference, this is commit 4965b8cd1bc1 ("firmware_loader: fix memory > > > > leak for paged buffer") in Linus's tree. > > > > > > > > > > I am not seeing this on Linux 5.9-rc5 for sure. > > > > > > > And it should be showing up in 5.4.y at the moment too, as this patch is > > > > in that tree right now... > > > > > > > > > > I don't see this patch in 4.19.146-rc1 > > > > It's not there, it's in 5.4.66-rc1, which worked for you somehow, right? > > > > > Linus's tree works for with this patch in. I compared the two files > > > for differences in commit between Linus's tree and 5.8.10-rc1 > > > > > > Couldn't find anything obvious. > > > > Again, really odd... > > > > I don't have a problem dropping it, but I should drop it from both 5.4.y > > and 5.8.y, right? > > > > Sorry. Yes. Dropping from 5.8 and 5.4 would be great until we figure out > why this patch causes problems. > > I will continue debugging and let you know what I find. Thanks, now dropped from both trees. greg k-h
